Comment to 'UNA is currently developing a number of pre-configured 'solutions' built on UNA Platform. Each solution would be a pre-configured turn key solution that would enable new users to get going straight away. Ultimately each 'solution' would still be configurable via Studio as per an UNA site. We plan to roll out all of these solutions over the coming 12 months - but we are interested to know what would be your preference - which ones do you want to see the most? Which ones should we consider doing first?'
Comment to UNA is currently developing a number of pre-configured 'solutions' built on UNA Platform. Each solution would be a pre-configured turn key solution that would enable new users to get going straight away. Ultimately each 'solution' would still be configurable via Studio as per an UNA site. We plan to roll out all of these solutions over the coming 12 months - but we are interested to know what would be your preference - which ones do you want to see the most? Which ones should we consider doing first?

  • J

    UNA, have to check the market, not to propose what other to very well (Facebook, LinkedIn, Meetic, ...) and what is needed that cannot (or hardly be found elsewhere). 

    Considering UNA is more likely to go on professional market (not or less anymore Dating website like Dolphin). Then it should be able to give opportunity for client to create high value services with strong quality (not the functionally unfinished Dolphin). So :

    1) Sharing, learning, building professional relations are the orientation to take.

    2) The UNA "out of the box" should be very very reliable, with out some 75% finished scripts that need to be customized. 

    The 2) point is part of a new economical model for UNA, that could include some services like help on configuration, or even co-animation, administration, ... . I will be ready to paid for this if I do not have anymore to spend hours and hours on qualification for testing new scripts or evolution from UNA scripts.