You're right. What I mean is that building a social network assumes a massive and scalable number of users and content. For UNA to be viable, it must run quickly whether it's handling just a few users on a single cloud server or millions of users across one or multiple server clusters. The modularized applications need to be optimized to ensure performance at any scale.

The real problem, however, is loading time. As I mentioned, it doesn’t matter which server is tested even a single user experiences around five seconds of loading, which is far too long. With a five-second load time, the abandonment rate increases exponentially, starting after just one second. Nowadays, everyone is in a hurry. A site that takes five seconds to load is perceived either as non-functional or as low-quality and people are right.

As an investor, I wouldn’t put money into such a site. I expect to see this script fully functional before I commit. Investments in time, resources, and people are significant, and I have no reason to support a slow site in the age of speed. We’re no longer in the 1990s, when the internet was born and networks were slow. My perception is that UNA has potential, but there is a significant “but.”

It’s like I want to buy a tanker truck for my transport business, but the one being offered is full of holes. I would lose countless potential clients every second because it leaks or moves too slowly it’s exactly the same problem.