Comment to '"Testament" Suggestion for Abandoned Products'
  • To be honest... It is truly something worth considering given it's broad spectrum covering all legal arguments and software agreement policies.. this I guess will apply to future contracts unless current ones are revised, and if any exists between unacms management and vendors. But also an excellent guide should unacms management consider, well.. the voting must still plays off, something I need to sit still and study... my man Mr. Romulus.. love it.

    • Any developer may, at some point, be forced to discontinue support for their software due to unforeseen circumstances be it personal, financial, or technical. However, this reality shouldn't mean that customers who have invested in the product are left without recourse or future support options.

      • It is deeply unfortunate that MSolution a developer who once contributed numerous potentially valuable products to the community was banned after no longer being able to provide support. As a result, all of their software was removed from the marketplace, and they were excluded from the community. This decision led to a significant loss not only of the software itself, but also for the many users who had purchased these products and were left without access or continued support. Valuable tools vanished, and customers were left without a way forward.

        If anyone has contact information for the developer, I would be interested in reaching out to ask whether they would consider releasing their products under an MIT license and making them publicly available on GitHub, along with a donation link for those who wish to show appreciation. Personally, I would be happy to donate a as a token of appreciation for the developer’s work, if the source code would be made publicly available. This gesture would help preserve the value of their contributions and support the ongoing impact of their work in the community.