Organization vs. Space
We plan on creating a global online community for certain group of people who are spread all over the world. We wanted to have a system that is flexible let each continent has its own countries, and in each countries, people can create their own communities in their cities, etc. We want them to have the options of creating their own groups (open, closed..etc) inside their (organizations/spaces..etc). We want these to run in parallel within the big platform.
My Questions, what is the best to use here: Oranization or Space?
Also, can "channels" be specific to one of these only (i.e., channels seen only in a specific space or organization and. not in the big community)
-
Hello @Tajrebatee !
I guess by default, the Orgs app is better because you may assign there the "Create Channel Auto" action and limit its number there. The same way is for the Groups creation privilige. Just allow them to create only 1 and it would be fine.
-
thanks @LeonidS !
Not sure I understood your point about channels. what I meant is to create channels that are seen only by the "org" or "space"?
Also, is there any limits for how much spaces under spaces (child spaces) are created?
-
Not sure I understood your point about channels. what I meant is to create channels that are seen only by the "org" or "space"?
I mean by default you can't set limit that some channels should be bound to the one org or group. So set the limit to create only one channel it would be a good motivation not to waste this opportunity.
Also, is there any limits for how much spaces under spaces (child spaces) are created?
No, there aren't.
