Today we look at the first REAL contender to ChatGPT 3.5 that has been released by Meta AI: Llama 2. What does it do better and why should you care? Let's find out.
I found this post a little strange. Una users usually create their own social media site to compete with the large social media companies because this is a reason of maybe mistrust, dislike of market control, etc. If it is just for social interaction there are numinous formats to connect to a community unless it a special community like strictly dating or a underground community that might get censored for content.
Meta has for years proven to censor anyone that does not support their political ideologies. Currently it seams everything is political now days; from healthcare to morality, they have self assigned themselves as the the masters arbiters of what is truth or false taking away the human right to express an opinion without being shadow-banned, remove access to your account (even though they are still using it to determine ad rates, etc.), slap a label of misinformation etc..
My question is why would you trust their version of of AI chat over another? Just because they are the big earners?
These AI chats are programs written with human personal biases to promote biased outcomes. Think "1984". I guess we as humans are getting lazier all the time, and would rather have some artificial process do their thinking for them and then except it with out any personal scrutiny. Quick and effortless! it is on the internet, it must be true, right?
I have observed human behavior for over 60 years an understand how those who lust for power operate. They will use it for control to increase their power, and there by increase their wealth.
I am not against technology in general, just technology that has a great potential to do harm to mankind no matter the potential to do good.
Great resource @Expertzkris ! Thank you for posting this!
I found this post a little strange. Una users usually create their own social media site to compete with the large social media companies because this is a reason of maybe mistrust, dislike of market control, etc. If it is just for social interaction there are numinous formats to connect to a community unless it a special community like strictly dating or a underground community that might get censored for content.
Meta has for years proven to censor anyone that does not support their political ideologies. Currently it seams everything is political now days; from healthcare to morality, they have self assigned themselves as the the masters arbiters of what is truth or false taking away the human right to express an opinion without being shadow-banned, remove access to your account (even though they are still using it to determine ad rates, etc.), slap a label of misinformation etc..
My question is why would you trust their version of of AI chat over another? Just because they are the big earners?
These AI chats are programs written with human personal biases to promote biased outcomes. Think "1984". I guess we as humans are getting lazier all the time, and would rather have some artificial process do their thinking for them and then except it with out any personal scrutiny. Quick and effortless! it is on the internet, it must be true, right?
I have observed human behavior for over 60 years an understand how those who lust for power operate. They will use it for control to increase their power, and there by increase their wealth.
I am not against technology in general, just technology that has a great potential to do harm to mankind no matter the potential to do good.