Lucid VS Artificer
Why Lucid and not Artificer? which one is newer ? and both can be used on native mobile apps?
What is Lucid best for?
What is Artificer best for?
-
Artificer is newer, supports App-mode well (which is similar to Lucid).
Lucid has built-in Styles editor, so you can create own style sets.
-
Thanks for the answer! Does Lucid support App-Mode as well? I I'm making sure the term of similar :-)
-
It does, but there’s also a couple of other things not implemented in it yet. For example dark mode is done via Styles while in Artificer it’s in inline styles.
Also we’re implementing a cool new feature - HTMX based data fetching which allows switching tabs without reloading parent elements. You can try it in at ci.una.io/test
-
"HYMX based data fetching which allows switching tabs without reloading parent elements" Wil it be on Lucid? or Artificer ? because I preferred Lucid and my goal is to make sure Lucid will still have update in the future. Also I have tried Dark Mode, when I applied it this is not dark, only text field is dark I did : Lucid > Style > Add New Mix >Toogle Dark Mode > Publish without setup anything, is there something I miss?
-
It's a tricky one. Style mixes don't play that well with Tailwindcss dark mode variants. Ideally you need to pick pre-set utility classes rather than custom values for styles, and same for dark: variant. We can do this, but it makes the style builder much more complex, plus we'd need a way to compile the css to tree-shake unused classes. This is all scheduled, but not quite there yet.
-
for now, which one do you recommend for the best for performance dark template for UNA both on mobile and desktop ?
-
Artificer for sure.
-
ok thanks a lot, I will go with this, Artificer !
