Privacy Concerns in the Spaces Product Architecture

In relation to the #Spaces product, the concept is clear: this module enables users to organize groups, called Spaces, in a nested hierarchy, where each ‘Parent Space’ can contain multiple ‘Child Spaces.’ This structure allows for extensive customization and flexibility in organizing content and groups.

However, this arrangement brings significant privacy challenges. Each Space comes with its own permissions and member controls, allowing users to manage their access at every level. While this offers flexibility, it becomes problematic when the names and links of these Spaces appear in autocomplete search results. If a secret or closed Space, intended to remain confidential, is included in search results, it undermines the core principle of a private space.

The module’s ability to support Communities and Sub-Communities is a valuable asset. For instance, on a platform dedicated to International Soccer/Football, a Parent Space could represent countries, while Child Spaces could represent individual teams. Users following a country could be automatically enrolled in related teams but should retain the option to follow only specific teams.

To uphold privacy within Spaces, all content and associated details must be accessible only to the creator and invited members. If such content becomes publicly searchable, it defeats the purpose of having private or secret Spaces. Ultimately, for the Spaces module to be effective, sensitive information must remain protected, and the principles of privacy must be respected.

According to the Cambridge Dictionary, "If something is secret, other people are not allowed to know about it." Therefore, if the titles of secret spaces and their content appear in public search results, they are no longer secret, and the definition of a secret space and secret content loses its meaning.